United States President Donald Trump has formally asked China to postpone his planned state visit to Beijing by roughly a month, injecting fresh uncertainty into US-China relations and unsettling global financial markets already strained by the Iran conflict and its impact on energy supplies.
Trump confirmed in the Oval Office on Monday that the US has asked to delay the summit by “a month or so,” citing the ongoing war with Iran and his desire to remain in Washington to coordinate the military effort. The Beijing visit had been scheduled for March 31 to April 2 and would have been the first trip by a sitting US president to China since Trump’s previous visit during his first term in 2017.
The postponement follows remarks Trump made to the Financial Times on Sunday in which he linked his travel plans directly to Beijing’s willingness to help reopen the Strait of Hormuz. “It’s only appropriate that people who are the beneficiaries of the strait will help to make sure that nothing bad happens there,” Trump said, indicating he wanted clarity on China’s position before travelling to Beijing.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent sought to soften the diplomatic framing on Monday, telling CNBC that any delay would be for logistical reasons, specifically that Trump may choose to remain in Washington as commander-in-chief while the Iran war continues, rather than because of a direct demand that China police the Strait of Hormuz. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt separately confirmed it was “quite possible” the meeting would be delayed.
The uncertainty underscores how significantly the US-Israeli strikes on Iran have reshaped global politics in the past two weeks, as Washington seeks to build a coalition of naval contributors to restore tanker traffic through a chokepoint that carries roughly one-fifth of the world’s daily oil supply.
Analysts warn that the diplomatic maneuvering is introducing a new category of market risk. Nigel Green, Chief Executive Officer of financial advisory firm deVere Group, said the episode illustrates how summits and state visits have shifted from ceremonial milestones into strategic instruments. “Political signals of this kind have the capacity to explode across energy markets, currencies, equities and global supply chains,” he said, adding that investors who have relied on traditional economic data cycles to guide positioning are now exposed to geopolitical decisions that can reshape sentiment within hours.
Analysts at the Council on Foreign Relations noted that China has spent two decades diversifying its energy sources and building strategic reserves, holding an estimated 1.2 billion barrels of onshore crude stockpiles as of January, enough to cover three to four months of demand, and that oil flows through Hormuz represent only around 6.6 per cent of China’s total energy consumption. This suggests Beijing is less exposed to the strait’s closure than Trump’s framing implied, and may have limited incentive to commit naval assets to a US-led operation.
In Beijing, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said only that China and the US had maintained communication on the visit, describing head-of-state diplomacy as playing an “irreplaceable strategic guiding role” in the bilateral relationship.
Trade talks between Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng were underway in Paris on Monday, originally intended to lay the groundwork for the now-delayed summit, with both sides navigating a fragile tariff truce reached in Busan last October. The fate of that truce, and the broader trajectory of US-China economic relations, now hangs on the resolution of a conflict that neither power initiated but both are being drawn into.

