The Supervising High Court Judge in each of the ten regions of Ghana will serve as Chief Registration Officers to adjudicate on matters relating to the legitimacy of challenged registrations.
The appointment which came from the Chief Justice, Justice Georgina Theodora Wood, tasked the Supervising High Court Judges to determine appeals against the decisions of the District Registration Committees made in respect of claims, objections and challenges that may arise during the ongoing biometric registration exercise taking place nationwide.
The full statement follows below…
The Hon. Lady Chief Justice, Mrs. Justice Georgina T. Wood, in the exercise of the powers conferred on her by Section 19 of the Public Elections (Registration of Voters) Regulations 2012 C.I. 72, has appointed each Supervising High Court Judge in each of the ten Regions of Ghana as Chief Registration Officers.
Their main function is to determine appeals against the decisions of the District Registration Committees made in respect of claims, objections and challenges that may arise during the ongoing biometric registration exercise taking place nationwide.
C.I. 72, which was publicly gazetted on February 21, 2012, replaces The Public Elections (Registration of Voters) Regulations, 1995 which has since been revoked.
Section 17 of C.I. 72 provides for the establishment of a District Registration Review Committee which shall examine challenges related to the registration of voters in the district. The functions of the Committee, which are spelt out in Section 18, mandate the Committee upon receipt of a completed voter registration form of a challenged applicant and the completed voter registration challenge form, to among other things take evidence from the concerned parties, examine relevant documents, call witnesses to testify and carry out any investigation relevant to the issue. The Committee shall for the purpose of taking evidence and calling witnesses have the same powers as a District Court.
Under Section 21 of C.I. 72, the Electoral Commission is to compile a provisional register for each polling station not later than three months after the completion of the registration process. Under Section 22, the Commission is to display the provisional register for public exhibition at the registration centre.
Section 24 of C.I. 72, provides for claims and objections to be made after the publication of the provisional register of voters. Under Section 25 (1), a district officer of the Commission upon receipt of claims and objections from the exhibition officer, must submit them to the District Registration Review Officer for determination. For this purpose, the District Court Magistrate shall be the District Registration Review Officer per Section 25 (3).
Section 25 (4) provides that in the event that a District Court does not exist in the district or the chairperson of the District Court is absent, a Judge of the High Court, who is appointed the Chief Registration Review Officer of the region, shall appoint a lawyer of not less than three years standing and who is preferably resident in the district to be the District Review Officer. The Chief Registration Review Officer is to report these appointments to the Chief Justice.
Under Section 25 (8), a person aggrieved by the decision of the District Registration Review Officer may appeal to the High Court.
All Supervising High Court Judges and Magistrates have been furnished with copies of C.I. 72 to apprise themselves of its contents. Additionally, the Judicial Training Institute (JTI) will soon commence training for these judges and magistrates to enable them to effectively discharge their functions under C.I. 72.

SGD)
Grace A. Tagoe (Mrs.)
Director Of Communications
For: Judicial Secretary

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.