Kwame Mayor says Ghana, and the whole World, including USA, could benefit from his impending Doctoral Dissertation on Modalities of Free and Fair Elections in solving Global conflicts of Election disputes — praising Dr. Sloj’s “Theory of Solving Election Disputes”, named after Dr. Sloj Litofe, Ph.D., the genious from Dr. Congo, and fellow Alumnus of the Prestigious University of Southern California (USC), — the “University of Spoiled Children”, known for producing Super Stars, and Legends, such as Neil Armstrong, (the first Man to walk on the Moon), and Actor John Wayne.
? ? ? “As soon as I complete my Doctoral Dissertation on (‘Political Equilibrium of Free and Fair Elections’), the whole World would benefit from Bullet Proof for Elections, to reduce Electoral violence, and disputes”, said the Scholar who has publicly appealed to Government Institutions, Private Organizations, especially, Democratic Organizations around the World, to provide him with Full Scholarship, or Grants to complete his Dissertation next year — cautioning that his Dissertation cannot be copied, or immitated without permission.
The Ghanaian-born, publicly urged Ghana to immediately amend its Constitution, to allow Electoral Petitions to be held, and decisions rendered by Supreme Court, no more than Fourteen days, or Two Weeks after Elections are held, and secondly, to prevent Swearing-in of any Presidential Candidate, until the Supreme Court renders its decision, Fourteen (14) days after any Election.
The Fair-minded Intellectual Politician appealed to the incumbent President, His Excellency, John Mahama, and his Party (NDC) to present their evidence, or Election Data, not only to Ghana’s Supreme Court, but to the General Public, as NPP’s Communications Team have done, to enable Ghanaians around the World, and the International Community to Intellectually, analyse the Elections’ Data.
? ?”The Intelligence level of the Supreme Court Judges hearing the Election Petition, will definately be judged, or measured not only by Ghanaians Around the World, but by the International Community who have access to the evidence presented by the Parties Online”, said “Osagyefo Dr” Kwame Appiah Boateng, popularly known by Ghanaians around the World as “Kwame Mayor”.
The Petitioner appealed to Ghanaians around the World, and the International Community to Intellectually analyse the evidence presented by the Election Petitioner — Opposition NPP Flagbearer, Nana Akuffo Addo’s Legal Team, and the Defense presented by incumbent President, John Mahama’s Legal Team, and make their own Fair Decisions, before Ghana’s Supreme Court Judges display their level of Intelligence, and Fair-Mindness to the whole World to judge them, after they have issued their Verdict on Ghana’s “Gargantuan Election Petition”.
>>> (Below is the Petitioner, NPP’s Opposition Leader, Nana Akuffo Addo’s evidence, presented to Ghana’s Supreme Court, and to the General Public to analyse — while the Nation waits for the Incumbent, and Defendant — His Excellency, President John Mahama, the Flagbearer of NDC, and another Defendant, Electoral Commission, to also provide their evidence to the News Media, or to the General Public, to challenge the Petitioner’s published evidence).
GHANA’S OPPOSITION PARTY, NPP, LED BY NANA AKUFFO ADDO PRESENTED THIS SCENARIO TO THE SUPREME COURT, AND TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC
………………………………….
………………………………….
…………………………………..
+ ?(GHANA’S OPPOSITION CITES THIS ELECTORAL CASE HERE 🙂 >>> ?The case involved a gubernatorial election (election for a governor) which was held on 14th April, 2007 in Edo State. The People?s Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, Prof. Oserheimen Osunbor was declared by the Independent Nigerian Electoral Commission (INEC) as winner of the election. However, Comrade Adams Oshiomole who contested on the ticket of the Action Congress challenged the declaration by filing a petition at the Court.

The Court, as stated earlier, annulled 14 out of the 18 Local Governments election results in Edo State for substantial non-compliance with the law and declared Adams Oshiomole as the validly elected Governor of the state ?being the candidate who scored the highest number of valid votes cast?.

+ ? ?The legitimacy and in fact, constitutionality of a presidency is derived from the validity of the votes that went into the declaration of the presidential election results. It is on the strength of this that the 2nd respondent at every election rejects certain votes and, actually, annuls results from some polling stations plagued by infractions?, the petitioners stated.

+ >>> The address cited several cases from across the globe where various courts had annulled results from various areas and made declarations based on whether the annulments affected the outcome or not.

+++ The petitioners in the case before the Supreme Court challenging the declared outcome of the December 2012 Presidential election, are asking the Court to annul election results from a total of 10,119 polling stations affected by various constitutional and statutory violations, malpractices and irregularities which have rendered the votes from such polling stations invalid.

+++ >>> The petition is seeking the court to annul the polling stations due to four main irregularities identified on the face of the primary records on the conduct and outcome of the election in those polling stations. These irregularities which have tainted these results are over voting, voting without biometric verification, the absence of presiding officer?s signature and same serial numbers on different polling station pink sheets. The petitioners are also seeking the court to annul polling stations in two other statistically minor categories, that is, different results for the same polling stations and locations not included in the official list of polling stations where elections were held.

+++ >>> The total number of votes from the 10,119 polling stations, the petitioners have restricted themselves to, is 3,931,339. Should the Court uphold the arguments of the petitioners and annul these votes tainted by invalidity, 2,622,551 votes will have to be deducted from the votes declared for John Mahama. These annulments and deductions of the invalid votes will mean that John Mahama will have 41.79% of the valid votes cast in the December Elections. Nana Akufo-Addo?s vote total will come down by 1,233,186 votes as a result of these infractions and as a result will have 56.85% of the valid votes cast in December.

>>> Indeed from the case presented by the petitioners, any of the four main irregularities, if sustained by the Court and the polling stations annulled, will be enough to bring John Mahama down as it will mean he did not achieve the mandatory 50% + 1 of valid votes to be declared winner of the election.

>>> +++ For example, should the court annul votes from the 4,487 polling stations affected by over voting, voting without biometric verification and the constitutional violation of the absence of presiding officer?s signature, 1,802,221 votes will be affected in total. Out of these, 1,229,966 votes will be deducted from the total votes declared for John Mahama as they have been tainted by the various irregularities while 534,999 will be deducted from the votes of Nana Akufo-Addo. With these annulments and deductions, John Mahama will have 47.26% of the valid votes cast while Nana Akufo-Addo will have 51.28% of the valid votes cast.

+++ >>> Should the court also sustain the petitioners? arguments on only the twin categories of over voting and voting without biometric verification, 1,365,723 votes will have to be annulled from the 3,371 polling stations whose results have been tainted and rendered invalid by one of the two irregularities or both. When annulled, John Mahama?s votes will be reduced by 932,501 which will result in him having 48.21% of the valid votes while Nana Akufo ? Addo?s votes will be reduced by 404,531 and will see him having 50.31% of the valid votes.

+++ >>> Again, should the court annul the 3,069 polling stations affected by over voting and the absence of presiding officer?s signature, a total of 1,270,682 votes will be affected. Out of these, John Mahama will see a reduction in his votes of 861,775 while Nana Akufo-Addo?s votes will similarly be reduced by 382,472. These annulments and deductions of the votes rendered invalid by the irregularities of over voting and the absence of presiding officer?s signature will see John Mahama having 48.46% of the valid votes while Nana Akufo-Addo will have 50.04%, more than the required 50% + 1 of valid votes needed to be declared as the winner of the election.

+++ >>> Also, if the Court decides to annul the votes from the 8,987 polling stations affected by the phenomenon of same serial numbers for different polling station pink sheets, a total of 3,508,491 votes will be annulled. John Mahama will see a reduction in his votes of 2,344,540 which will reduce his share of the valid votes cast therefore to 43.15% while Nana Akufo ? Addo?s votes will also be reduced by 1,097,169 giving him 55.45% of the valid votes.

The malpractice of duplicate serial numbers is, therefore on its own, enough to overturn the declared outcome of the election.

+++ On the individual categories, should the Court decide to annul votes from the 1,722 polling stations affected by over voting, a total of 745,569 votes will be affected and annulled. Out of this total, 504,014 votes will be deducted from the votes of John Mahama. This will give him 49.47% of the valid votes cast, below the required 50%+1 of valid votes needed. Nana Akufo-Addo?s votes will also be reduced by 226,198 giving him 49.0% of the valid votes.

=== Also, if the Court sustains the petitioners? arguments on voting without biometric verification, results from 2,131 polling stations with a total of 813,866 votes will be affected and annulled. When annulled, John Mahama?s votes will see a reduction of 560,399 while Nana Akufo-Addo?s votes on the other hand will be reduced by 234,970. These deductions will result in John Mahama having 49.25% of the valid votes while Nana Akufo-Addo will also have 49.25% of the valid votes.

—* The constitutional violation of the absence of presiding officers? signature affects 1,638 polling stations with a total of 659,814 votes. When annulled, 448,153 votes will be deducted from the votes of John Mahama while 197,890 votes will be deducted from the votes of Nana Akufo-Addo. This will result in John Mahama having 49.60% of the valid votes cast while Nana Akufo-Addo will have 48.87% of the valid votes.

* Source : Uhuru Times

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.